Is there anything that you think could be developed more or maybe a gap in what they’ve covered?

Peer Review Instructions
For your peer reviews, you need to attend to a couple different things: the paper and your idea of the data. I want you to engage with your peers in a supportive and generative manner. Think about how you like to receive feedback!
You can make your comments directly on the draft itself, comments in the comments box on the bottom right, or even write them out in something like a Word doc and attach that.
Please do the following:(Two essays)
Evaluate their introduction. Keep an eye out for an understanding of their topic, whether it has motivated the reader to read on, and gives a clear understanding of where they’re taking you.Evaluate their literature. Does it connect with what you expected from their introduction? Does it build out an argument for deeper understanding on the topic? Is there anything that you think could be developed more or maybe a gap in what they’ve covered? Think in a way of helping!Evaluate their data. What sort of data are they presenting? How does it connect into their topic? What sorts of things did they find so far and does this work with what they’re trying to do?Also, look at the data they’ve included and see what your takeaways are. Is there anything additional that stands out to you? Is there anything that you think might be beneficial in your reading of the data that connects into their topic?Overall, be supportive. If you see something that needs development that’s great and you should note that for them. It’s also important to contextualize as this is a draft, so keep in mind that this is happening alongside them making a better/stronger paper so also give attention to what you think is done well, what you like, etc.