Explain Why Vaccination Against COVID-19 Should Be Promoted Differently in Younger and Older Adults.

Explain Why Vaccination Against COVID-19 Should Be Promoted Differently in Younger and Older Adults.
Step 1 (Access the library guide for more inreformation) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4-uDGJ0M1ig (Links to an external site.)
Select an empirical research article on a topic within LifespanDevelopment (Review the library guide module for assistance). Followthe following criteria1-A publication not older than 10 years (2011-2021)2-Published by a publisher of professional books or journals3-Scholarly and peer-reviewed
Before you begin typing remember the followingAPA FormatCover pageFont: Times New Roman 11 or 121-inch margins all around4-6 pages in length (excluding cover and reference page)Double-spacedIn-text citationsReference page
Step 2- Submit the assignmentThe article review should read similar to a book review. Be mindfulthat some of the questions may not apply to your selected article. Insuch a case, do not answer them. Be comprehensive in your review. Focuson the strengths and weaknesses of the research. The final paper is anessay to be written clearly and logically (not bullet points).SECTIONS TO BE INCLUDED IN THE PAPERPART 1- SUMMARYProvide a detailed summary of the research article.Note relevant facts and findings. Include the author’s conclusions. Usethe sections below as a guide:IntroductionHas relevant research been adequately reviewed?Are assertions supported with the appropriate citations?Are the hypotheses clearly stated, and do they flow logically from the information in the introduction?Method SectionWas the nature of the subject sample specified to include demographic data?Does the design of the study allow an adequate test of the hypotheses?Are there any methodological flaws that might affect the validity of the results?Is sufficient detail presented to allow one to replicate the study?Results SectionDid the statistically significant effects support or refute the hypotheses?Are the differences reported large or small?Were the appropriate statistics used?Do the tables, figures, and text match?Discussion SectionDo the conclusions presented match the results reported?If the author speculates about the implications of results, does he or she stray too far from the results reported?How well do the results mesh with existing theory and empirical data?Does the author point the way to directions for future research?
PART 2 – ANALYSIS (A MINIMUM OF FOUR PARAGRAPHS)Present the strengths and weaknesses that you have found in thepublication. In addition, highlight the author(s) contribution to thefield. Write about the gaps and contradictions in the article. Take astandpoint of either supporting or rejecting the author(s) assertions.Support your arguments with facts and relevant theories pertinent to thearea of knowledge.